“Oh, and by the way, my wife tried
that choke defense you taught her on me and it didn’t work. Guess
you need to do your homework.”
The husband of a recent Women’s
Self-Defense seminar participant uttered these words to me with more than
apparent satisfaction. My reaction? I was not the least bit
surprised; I was, however, greatly dismayed that one of my participants
had lost a bit of confidence gained, not because of an inherent flaw in
the technique, but because of interpersonal partner-training dynamics.
Of course it didn’t work.
Physical self-defense techniques are hard enough to master without the
added interpersonal implications of practicing on someone who you don’t
particularly wish to harm and isn’t posing a significant threat to your
health. This reason alone explains my repeated insistence that a
student seek out a specific self-defense class with a supportive environment
to practice techniques. In my classes I have a very firm rule: “DO
NOT TRY THIS AT HOME. No student shall practice any self-defense
technique with anyone other than a fellow instructor, student, or trained
martial artist who understands the dynamics of the particular technique
in application.”
The successful execution of
a physical self-defense application greatly depends on any number of variables,
some of which are wholly beyond the control of the victim.
Two factors, however, can greatly enhance, or diminish, the chances for
successful execution of a technique: (a) an absolute willingness
to harm your opponent and (b) the element of surprise.
Given that women are most
likely to be attacked by intimates (current or former husbands, boyfriends,
partners), willingness to harm can be a very difficult obstacle to overcome.
While contemplating hurting those whom we love can be extremely difficult,
even traumatic, these very same people are the ones most likely to cause
us harm. At some point we must make a conscious choice that our individual
lives are worth defending against anyone. This action requires 100%
commitment to the physical and psychological ramifications of a self-defense
technique. Lack of this total commitment ensures failure of the defense.
Enter the element of surprise.
If an attacker knows in advance what the defense to his/her attack will
be, then pre-empting that defense becomes much easier. While the element
of surprise is missing from many self-defense classes, your partner in
this arena is trained to assume surprise rather than combat what he/she
knows is coming. When working with a spouse, partner or boyfriend, not
only is the element of surprise gone, but he/she is not trained to assume
surprise and “go with” a technique. In a class, uncooperative partners
often find out just exactly how painful a technique can be when executed
at ¾ or even full force if necessary, a dynamic that is missing
from practicing with “untrained” individuals where “all or nothing” takes
over. Add in the fact that many male partners will try to add their
own expertise or attempt to prove why a technique will not work and you’ve
got a recipe for disaster.
For these reasons, practicing
any technique, especially one that has yet to be mastered, with an intimate
only sets the student up for potentially traumatizing failure. Because
she can’t commit 100% to the execution of the application for fear of hurting
him, and because he knows not only that a defense to his mock attack is
coming, but also exactly what that defense entails, the technique inevitably
fails. Practicing with fully trained and trusted partners in a safe, supportive
and structured environment ensures that a technique can be practiced at
near 100% commitment levels without the fear of harming your opponent.
Ultimately, it will save you some unnecessary heartache and frustration
as well.